|
KMID : 0926620090140010062
|
|
Korean Journal of Hospital Management
2009 Volume.14 No. 1 p.62 ~ p.83
|
|
|
A Study on the Recent Labor-Management Dispute Cases at Medical Institutions
|
|
Shin Gang-Wook
Yu Seung-Hum
Kim Young-Hoon
Kim Tae-Woong
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Recently, a long strike by hospital labor union emerged as a serious social issue. During the Worldcup Games in June, 2002, labor strikes broke up at ’C’, ’K’ and other hospitals, and in 2007, ’Y’ hospital suffered much from a strike. Such series of extreme labor disputes have awakened people of importance of a more stable labor-management relationship for the medical institutions responsible for people’s health than any other business organization. The purpose of this study was to examine the labor-management disputes at ’Y’ hospital in 2007 and ’C’ and ’K’ hospitals in 2002. The results of this study can be summarized as follows; First, requests of the labor union such as pay raise, reemployment of the irregular workers as regular employees and participation of the labor union in personnel affairs are the long-held or core issues suffered by the medical institutions. Such issues are not independent from each other but complicated with each other surrounding the pay raise. Accordingly, it is not easy to determine the genuine bone of issue for labor-management disputes. Second, the model type of disputes between labor and management at medical institutions may be strike. However, it is conceived that the type of disputes would be subject to change as the essential medical service area system began to be operated since 2008. Third, the common characteristic of the labor strike among the 3 sample hospitals was occupation of the hospital lobby for a sit-in strike to maximize the negative effects of strike. Article 42 (Prohibition of Violence) of Labor Union and Labor Relation Coordination Act prohibits occupation of production or other important business facilities. In addition, since Ministry of Labor interprets that the hospital lobby belongs to the important business facilities enumerated by Article 42 of the above act, occupation of the hospital lobby for a sit-in strike may be too controversial to be admitted as a fair act of labor dispute when its legitimacy should be judged. Fourth, the counter-measures taken by the hospitals against the strike were observance of the principle ’no labor no pay,’ closure, legal action, accusation, claim for recovery of damage, provisional seizure, disciplinary punishment, etc., but the principle of ’no labor, no pay’ was not applied in a fair manner by ’C’ and ’K’ hospitals. However, ’Y’ hospital applied this principle thoroughly to the strike; the hospital conduced to correction of the wrong labor-management relationship by refusing inclusion in the labor collective agreement of a provision about payment of wage during the period of strike or labor union’s request to that effect during a strike. In addition, ’Y’ hospital took an effective measure to end the strike earlier by notifying the labor union of cancellation of the collective agreement and banning the unionists from entering the hospital.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
hospital Labor union, Labor-management relationship
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
 
|
|